PDA

View Full Version : The moon has more water than previously believed, study says



Blaster
05-29-2011, 12:45 AM
c/p from
www.globalpost.com

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_H44IkuSV9qQ/SrvgcKzr85I/AAAAAAAAL2w/kCzdhirpNVQ/s320/water-on-moon.jpg

The moon, long thought to be relatively dry, is looking wetter and wetter as new research shows the existence of deep reservoirs of water

The moon is wetter than we thought, it turns out. Much wetter. And no one is sure exactly what that means.

A new analysis of tiny fragments of hardened lava indicates that the moon has plenty of water inside it, maybe as much as the Earth, according to msnbc.com, citing a study in Science magazine. The water content in the magma was 100 times higher than had been suspected before, Bloomberg News reported. This discovery adds to previous data that indicated that some parts of the surface of the moon were much wetter than predicted as well.

Scientists are surprised, and say that the discoveries will force a rethinking of what we believe about the moon's creation. The prevailing hypothesis holds that it was the result of the Earth and a Mars-sized body colliding. Scientists had believed that such an impact would have baked out most of the water in the parts that became the moon, msnbc said.

"You really would not expect, based on what we know about this model, to have any water present in the moon at all," said the study's lead author, Erik Hauri, of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. "The fact that these (samples) have terrestrial levels of water is really a stunner."

The research began when a member of the team at Brown University gave a vial of moon dirt to a freshman student and asked him to analyze it. The student noticed some clear crystals in the dirt that contained a small amount of glass. The water content in the trapped glass was much higher than expected, indicating the existence of a reservoir of water deep inside the moon that may have the same concentration of water as some reservoirs on Earth, the New York Times reported.

Previous research had demonstrated the existence of water in lunar craters, but the thinking was that it was a result of impacts from meteors or comets. If the interior of the moon really does contain as much water as the new research suggests, then ice that exists at the bottom of lunar craters might be the result of volcanic activity, rather than a large impact, Bloomberg News said.

The results are confusing, to say the least. Researchers say that the existence of so much water on and in the moon may mean that the impact that formed the moon was much hotter, or much cooler, than previously imagined. Whatever it means, it adds new mystery to our near neighbor in the heavens.

humberto
05-29-2011, 12:50 AM
sceintist have long believed almost all water on earth came from the space in the form of meteorites
and they believed the moon is full of water since many many years ago

whoever wrote the above arcticle is obviously not a scientist nor his scources

Blaster
05-29-2011, 12:59 AM
You have a point. These are just theories. Still, the more we learn, the closer we will get to the understanding of origins of life. These little finds come at great cost, might I add. Billions and billions of taxpayers dollars, and I personally think it's worth every penny.

humberto
05-29-2011, 01:02 AM
You have a point. These are just theories. Still, the more we learn, the closer we will get to the understanding of origins of life. These little finds come at great cost, might I add. Billions and billions of taxpayers dollars, and I personally think it's worth every penny.

nope most this finds come out of our own pockets no one gives me any tax money

Blaster
05-29-2011, 01:16 AM
What you get in return is some food for your brain..lol Your theory where the water comes from has nothing to do with the theory how Moon came to be.

From my perspective, the collision this strong would expose many of the planet's natural resources hidden within. And this might give the future generations an option to explore Moon surface further and possibly mine the natural resources that are depleting with geometric proportion here on Earth.

ft@t@lk™
05-29-2011, 02:07 AM
great article Blaster...the more we think we know, the less we really know

:thumbsup:

humberto
05-29-2011, 02:25 AM
What you get in return is some food for your brain..lol Your theory where the water comes from has nothing to do with the theory how Moon came to be.

From my perspective, the collision this strong would expose many of the planet's natural resources hidden within. And this might give the future generations an option to explore Moon surface further and possibly mine the natural resources that are depleting with geometric proportion here on Earth.

around the sun there used to be a whole bunch of asteroids many millions of years ago
they all started to collide with each other and forming bigger and bigger asteroids creating gravitational forces attracting other smaller asteroids wich collided with the bigger ones and formed all the planets around the sun one of those smaller ones was big enough when it collided with earth that forced enough mass up in the air to form the moon
wich each year gets farther away from earth because of the pull of the planet it has remained close to earth but you can trace it backwards to the original point of impact

those are facts there is no theory of how the moon came to be just facts

Blaster
05-29-2011, 04:35 AM
You totally lost me there. What you've recited is an episode of "How the Universe Works " on the Science Channel. Great show, don't get me wrong. One of the episodes theories that hydrogen and oxygen are amongst two of the most common elements in the universe.

These are not actual "facts" sort of speak. They are the "facts" based on our observations. They were never proven to be facts physically, but only theoretically by our best and brightest. Think about how many of our best and brightest ideas and theories were laughed at just in the past 600 years? I hope you get my drift, no pun intended.