Recievers

[bolts47]

I have a dreamlink t6 right now, (total pain in the ass) has there bin any fixes for this box ? is there any body out there that can tell me if there is a box out there that is better or at least more stable than this t6. I'm so sick of having to scan channels in every week so they will work, and then having to spend an 1hr and a half deleteing the ones I don't want to see on my guide?

[nobodyspecial]

I have a dreamlink t6 right now, (total pain in the ass) has there bin any fixes for this box ? is there any body out there that can tell me if there is a box out there that is better or at least more stable than this t6. I'm so sick of having to scan channels in every week so they will work, and then having to spend an 1hr and a half deleteing the ones I don't want to see on my guide?

there are no iks/kodi boxes that work well

[harddrive4096]

Well then what is a good simple stb to use? I'm getting back into testing again. I used to use pansat 3500 but they are no longer supported.

[nobodyspecial]

the dreamlink t5 and t4 work well

[jvvh5897]

Well then what is a good simple stb to use? I'm getting back into testing again. I used to use pansat 3500 but they are no longer supported.

The 3500 could be used for IKS until the Turbo 8PSK format came out. Now, you might be able to use it for DSS audio on 101 degree sat, but any support or work done on the older boxes has to be done by the owner/users of the box. The "factory" pansat support went away when DN sued 7 (? !!) years ago. Of course pansat boxes are still good for true FTA DVB-S.